Natural Products Insider

MAY-JUN 2019

INSIDER is the leading information source for marketers, manufacturers and formulators of dietary supplements, healthy foods and cosmeceuticals. Since 1997, INSIDER has been serving the needs of the global nutrition industry.

Issue link: http://digital.naturalproductsinsider.com/i/1110619

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 26 of 48

22 INSIDER May /June 2019 Every natural products brand will, at one time or another, consider whether to purchase individual components of its product or to opt for a premix. The convenience of purchasing a single premix—as opposed to locating, purchasing and maintaining inventory of multiple individual components—is often simple math. The calculus to proceed, however, often does not account for regulatory compliance. Both brand owners and suppliers must weigh various conisderations specifi c to premixes. Some suppliers' entire business is to produce and sell premixes, which can make for a solid business platform. For brand owners, the challenges often occur with its compliance obligations. A supplier's role may be simple blending, granulation, microencapsulation or some other form of activity before delivering the product to the manufacturer or brand. The supplier is required to manufacture the product according to existing regulations. The manufacturer is required to have or generate specifi c information about the premix. This includes all ingredients and subcomponents as well as disclosure of potential allergens and potencies, and all this information must be gathered with documented specifi city. The supplier may hold some of the information close without disclosing everything about the product. The manufacturer must comply with what is likely a different set of regulations than the premix supplier. Unfortunately, it's common that manufacturers operate without complete information of the Premix Regulatory Challenges by Jim Lassiter components of a premix; sometimes, they don't ever receive the order listing showing which ingredients are dominant in the mix. Requirements that the manufacturer and the brand owner must meet can only be achieved with complete information. Suppliers may justify nondisclosure with claims of "proprietary information," but mechanisms can alleviate that concern. Supply agreements with specifi c defi nition(s) of what components will be used can address cases where the manufacturer wants the blending or other processing done on its behalf. Agreements that specify materials/components in the specifi c amounts should not be overlooked. Dietary supplement manufacturers that receive the premix on a customer's behalf—especially in cases where the premix is a combination of dietary ingredients—must positively identify the premix every time it is received. The accomplishment of that seemingly simple task is challenging when the received material is a blend. The manufacturer must disclose the complete list of ingredients, as well as the means to properly assay the premix for identity. This can be exceptionally challenging depending on the nature of the blend and may not simply be resolved by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy scan alone. Everyone in the supply chain that uses a premix needs this information. The supplier should consider the requirements of its customers and assist with the development and understanding of the necessary specifi cations. Dietary supplements brands must test for the identity, purity, strength and composition of the product, and it must be within acceptable limits for contamination. Demonstration of these aspects is challenging when the received material is not quantifi ed by the supplier, and the complete information about the material is not disclosed. Additionally, the material may not have been tested for potency. This fundamental requirement is too often not met, and the downstream consequences are signifi cant. These are challenges that more heavily weigh on the brand owner than the supplier or manufacturer. Quality agreements, documentation of the composition of the premix, and verifi cation that the blend can be identifi ed to the satisfaction of the regulations help address these concerns. The use of premixes in manufacturing is commonplace and not likely to change. The convenience and effi ciency weigh heavily on manufacturers that provide products with complex combinations. The solutions are agreements and open and direct communication aimed to address the regulatory requirements. As chief operating offi cer, Jim Lassiter oversees all consulting operations at REJIMUS (rejimus.com), formerly Ingredient Identity. He has more than four decades of experience in quality control (QC), and government and regulatory affairs throughout the pharmaceutical, dietary supplement and natural product industries. Contract Manufacturing: Premixes

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Natural Products Insider - MAY-JUN 2019